Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Surprise! Neither MJ or Debbie Rowe are the Biological Parents!

SHOCKING!!!( At least to ME!)

jackos-kids-unmasked2

Ok peeps, may be am the only one that never really looked hard, i mean read between the lines or everyone is simply f**ked...am just gonna have to be a lil blunt here.

I had the most amazing night, i mean the best dreams i have had in a long while and then am i get the most weird of them all as news feeder: 'Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his children' And 'Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother of the two kids she bore for Michael'. 'All three children were conceived in vitro — outside the womb'.

Maybe i should go back to sleep, perhaps am still in wonderland, except its the shocking reality!

Multiple sources deeply connected to the births says Michael was not the sperm donor for any of his kids. Debbie’s eggs were not used. She was merely the surrogate, and paid well for her services in the births of Michael Jr. and Paris.

In the case of Prince Michael II (the youngest), the surrogate was never told of the identity of the “receiving parent” — Michael Jackson. Three days after Prince was born at Grossmont Hospital in San Diego County, Jackson’s lawyer came to the hospital to pick the baby up and deliver him to Michael. We do not know if Jackson chose the sperm or egg donors or if he even knew who they were.

Although Rowe is not the biological mother, it’s not a slam dunk that she would lose a custody battle. This type of case has never been litigated in California courts. Since Rowe was married to Jackson when Michael Jr. and Paris were born, there’s a presumption that she’s the biological parent. That presumption can be rebutted by other evidence.
there's said to be documents outlining the whole arrangement for the birth of all three kids. Nonetheless, it’s still an open issue with the courts.

Damn...i honestly think this is one serious Hollyweird flick at its finest.

allvoices

Related Posts

No comments: